Age/Gender: 19, Male
Location: Texas or something
Job: Squirrel shaver
Newgrounds Stats
Whistle Status: Normal
Exp. Points: 480 / 550
Exp. Rank #: 79,173
Voting Pow.: 4.92 votes
BBS Posts: 13 (0.01 per day)
Flash Reviews: 6
Music Reviews: 0
Trophies: 7
Stickers: 0
Entry #16
Adobe Alchemy and Open-Source C / C++ Games, Music Videos, etc., on Newgrounds: Boooo.
Posted by NAveryW Nov. 28, 2008 @ 7:46 PM ESTThe releases of ActionScript 3 and Alchemy mark the beginning of a new era for Flash game makers. Flashers are no longer limited to making Flash games in Flash or Flex, but can, in fact, port practically any game made with C or C++ to Flash, as long as they have the original source code.
We have seen this already with the port of DOOM that Mike (no last name) has submitted to Newgrounds, which is currently #1 on the Top 50. But, wait... is this right? Is this ethical?
I could understand this if id Games actually submitted it themselves, but Mike didn't make the game (despite the fact that it's not a stone). If this becomes a trend, Newgrounds will be filled with Flash ports of open-source games that the submitters didn't even make. At the top of the Top 50 will be classic DOS games instead of games actually made by Flash artists. Games that were not created by Newgrounds members, but simply run through a conversion program after changing a few lines of code to make them more internet compatible.
Does that seem right? At all? Not to me. In my opinion, using Alchemy to convert C++ games you made yourself to Flash and uploading them here is awesome. Taking games other people made and uploading them here, however, is not. It's the same thing as taking open-source Flash games and uploading them to Newgrounds even though you didn't make them. Nobody would consider that ethical, so why is it OK if they're DOS games?
To take this a step further, I have the same problem with a lot of music video submissions. For example, someone will animate a music video of a song by Weird Al or They Might Be Giants and upload it to Newgrounds. The music video will then receive great acclaim, many votes of 5 and several awards, not because the person who submitted the Flash did a good job, but because the song itself is funny. A great example of this is Super Mario Hyadain, animated by Scott-Falco. He stated in the description that he didn't write the song; it came from a video on Nico. Yet I'd hazard to bet that the reason it has a 4.35 out of 5 on Newgrounds has nothing to do with what Scott-Falco did, but the fact that the song is catchy. In fact, in my opinion, the visuals in the original Nico video are much better.
I'm not normally one to consider things "overrated" (perhaps because I'm called that so much on YouTube), but this is probably the only case where I'd make an exception. And I've felt this way for a long time, but have finally decided to say something about it before Alchemy becomes more accessible to people who aren't as familiar with compiling C++ programs and such (and, of course, to people who can run it on Windows without using Cygwin).
If you're voting on a Flash submission and you give it a high score based on stuff that the person/people who made the Flash didn't do, then, as the saying goes, you're doing it wrong. Hardly anybody seems to share this opinion, but it's something that I stand firmly behind. I'm not blaming the people who submitted the Flashes for this "overratedness"; I think it's awesome that Mike ported DOOM to Flash, and Weird Al himself enjoys seeing people animate music videos of his songs. But when we vote upon the quality of the submission, we should be voting upon the quality of what the submitter did. Otherwise, we may as well give students perfect grades for papers we know are plagiarized.
Log in to comment! | Share this!The People Have Spoken
13 Comments